 |
| http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?id=311&issue=100 |
"Otis Rolley said he would, if elected, propose a $1 per bullet tax on all bullet purchases in the city. The idea was part of an overall crime plan he unveiled Tuesday.
Read more:HERE
... and don't forget this formerly reported "great idea" to "stop crime" via ammunition registration:
"
| "Micro-stamping" |
| "Encoded Ammunition"/Bullet Serialization |
"Encoded Ammunition" (Bullet and Cartridge Case Serialization) Means: * Forfeiture of Currently-Owned Ammunition * A Separate Registration for Every Box of New Ammunition * Outrageously Expensive Ammunition Costs for Police & Private Citizens Alike *A Waste of Taxpayer Money, Better Spent on Traditional Police Programs In 2007, the sponsor of "encoded ammunition" legislation in Maryland urged lawmakers across the country to introduce the same kind of legislation in their states. The bill would require ammunition manufacturers to engrave a serial number on "the base of the bullet and the inside of the cartridge casing of each round" of ammunition for popular sporting caliber center-fire rifles, all center-fire pistols, all .22 rimfire rifles and pistols, and all 12 gauge shotguns." Read more HERE ------- ...Yes - now THAT will stop the criminals from LEGALLY gaining access to ammunition - right? Wrong! Lawbreakers don't buy guns legally except from YOUR GOVERNMENT! That's why they call them "lawbreakers" - because the law has no bearing on their decision-making process - whether it is now - or later - whether new laws are in place or not. The idea is not necessarily to "use" our firearms to institute change - but to never forget the concept of "mutually assured destruction" (M.A.D.) - the same method of power balance our own government employed to maintain a check on Soviet nuclear power. Is it not reasonable to use the same logic when it comes to maintaining a check on Federal power vis a vis We The People? Let's stick with the second amendment shall we? |
No comments:
Post a Comment